Guide

Why Spain's wildfires are getting worse

It is not that there are more fires: it is that a few of them have become unstoppable. Behind that lie more heat, deeper drought, abandoned land filling with shrub, and houses built into the forest.

← See the live map (in Spanish)

Every summer the same question comes back: why is so much burning now? The short answer is that fire has not changed, but the landscape and the climate it burns in have. A wildfire needs fuel, favourable conditions and an ignition. The ignition is almost always the same as ever —over 90% of fires in Spain are human in origin— but today it finds far more fuel, drier, over more months of the year, and with more people living inside it.

This page explains those four pieces, in order: heat, drought, shrub encroachment, and the wildland-urban interface.

What changed is not the count, it is the size

The number of incidents declared each year in Spain has been broadly stable for decades. What has changed is that a few fires account for almost all the area burned: ordinary years interrupted by episodes that burn a decade's worth in a fortnight. This is the area the European satellite system Copernicus/EFFIS has mapped in Spain each year.

Area burned in Spain detected by satellite, in hectares per year. Source: EFFIS / Copernicus, fires of 1 ha or more, grouped by municipality and day. This is not the official statistic published by MITECO, Spain's environment ministry: EFFIS measures from space and its detection capability has improved over the years, so it is useful for comparing the scale of one year against another, not for quoting an official figure.

hectares a year on average in the first decade

hectares a year on average in the latest decade:

of everything burned in the period fits into just two years ()

Four changes that feed each other

None of the four explains what is happening on its own. Shrub-choked woodland in a wet year does not produce a megafire; nor does a heatwave over a farmed mosaic. The problem appears when they coincide.

1 · More heat: the season is no longer just summer

Spain has warmed faster than the global average. According to AEMET, the state meteorological agency, the climatological summer has stretched by almost five weeks since the 1980s: what used to be three months of high risk now looks more like five. And heatwaves, as well as being more frequent, arrive earlier: March, April and October now produce fire episodes that were oddities thirty years ago.

For firefighting, what matters is not the average temperature but the extreme days. A fire can be put out while its intensity stays below what crews and aircraft can absorb; above that threshold, neither more aircraft nor more crews change the outcome, and all that is left is protecting people and waiting for the fire to meet a change in weather or in landscape.

Diagram: fire intensity against firefighting capacity Two intensity curves across the day. On a normal day the curve stays below the limit of firefighting capacity. On an extreme day it exceeds that limit for hours and, overnight, does not drop far enough for crews to regain the fire. Fire intensity time of day → night Limit of firefighting capacity Normal day · the fire can be attacked Extreme day · beyond capacity Conceptual diagram: it illustrates the mechanism, these are not measurements
Night used to bring respite: the temperature dropped, humidity rose and the fire "lay down" enough to be worked before dawn. In recent episodes that overnight recovery no longer arrives, and the fire strings together days with no window of opportunity.

2 · Deeper drought: what never used to burn now does

Vegetation does not burn well while it holds water. What makes a drought dangerous is not only that less rain falls, but that a warmer atmosphere pulls water out of soil and plants far faster: the same rainfall goes less far than it did decades ago.

That changes the landscape on two timescales. Fine fuel —grass, leaf litter, twigs— loses its moisture in hours and responds immediately; coarse fuel and deep soils dry out over weeks or months, and they are what decides whether a fire stays on the surface or takes the whole forest. After several dry years in a row, the damp gully, the shaded slope and the valley bottom burn too: precisely the places firefighting counted on to stop the fire.

Diagram: how fast each type of fuel dries out Three bars representing the response time of fine fuel in hours, coarse fuel in weeks, and soil and living vegetation in months or years. Grass and leaf litter Branches and trunks Soil and living plants fine fuel coarse fuel deep moisture hours weeks months · years of accumulated drought How long each fuel takes to dry out — and to get wet again
A summer storm brings the grass back in a few hours, but it does not return moisture to the soil or the trees. That is why a fire can behave as if it were mid-August a week after it rained.

This observatory publishes a daily fire risk level based on the FWI index (Copernicus/ECMWF), which combines exactly that: temperature, humidity, wind and accumulated drought. How to read the risk level →

3 · Shrub encroachment: the land nobody works any more

This is the least visible change from the road and probably the most decisive. Seventy years ago the Spanish countryside was worked: crops up the last slope, livestock eating the shrub, firewood collected every year, and a mosaic of plots separated by field boundaries and tracks. That mosaic was, in effect, a free network of firebreaks that nobody designed.

With rural depopulation, that landscape closed up. Fields were abandoned, shrub colonised the terraces and the woodland grew dense and continuous, with no clearings or breaks. A fire that once met a patchwork of mown, grazed plots now has kilometres of unbroken fuel, and the shrub beneath the trees acts as a ladder carrying flame into the canopy.

Current orthophoto of Ibort: the mosaic of fields has disappeared under a continuous mass of planted pine, with only two open plots left beside the village.
Aerial photograph of Ibort in the 1956 American Flight survey: the village is surrounded by dozens of cultivated fields separated by boundaries, with woody vegetation only along banks and gullies.
Ibort · 1956 Today
Ibort (Sabiñánigo, Huesca), a village abandoned in the 1960s and resettled since. Every one of those cultivated plots was a break for fire; today pine covers the slope without a single gap, and the village has ended up inside it. American Flight survey (1956) and current PNOA imagery, CNIG Digital Photo Library and IGN.
Diagram: how fire advances across a farmed mosaic compared with continuous woodland On the left, a mosaic landscape where fire loses continuity on reaching cultivated plots. On the right, continuous woodland where fire advances unobstructed as far as the village. Farmed and grazed mosaic Fire loses continuity and can be attacked Continuous shrub-choked woodland Nothing stops the fire before the next village
The difference is not only how much vegetation there is, but whether it is broken up. Woodland with plenty of biomass but interrupted by pasture, crops and thinned areas produces manageable fires; the same woodland with no breaks produces fires of tens of thousands of hectares. Conceptual diagram.

≈ 55%

of Spain's territory is forest land —around 27 million hectares— and it keeps growing over abandoned fields. MITECO, Forestry Statistics Yearbook

≈ ⅓

is how much Spain's sheep population has fallen in the last quarter century: fewer mouths eating the shrub each spring. MAPA, livestock surveys

> 90%

of ignitions are human in origin: the problem is not a shortage of sparks, it is what they land in. MITECO

An important caveat: more woodland is not bad news in itself. Spain has more tree cover today than for much of the last century, and that is good for water, soil and biodiversity. The problem is that this woodland has grown without management and without breaks. The answer is not less forest, but structured forest: thinning, grazing, prescribed burning and a mosaic that gives the landscape back the breaks fire used to run into.

4 · Wildland-urban interface: when the forest reaches the front door

While the countryside closed up, people came back to it in a different way: second homes, scattered housing estates, warehouses and isolated houses on plots surrounded by trees. That zone where housing and forest vegetation mix is called the wildland-urban interface, and it is the point where a fire stops being a forestry matter and becomes a civil protection one.

The effect on firefighting is direct: every threatened estate ties up resources that stop working the main front. The house gets defended —as it must be— and meanwhile the fire grows where nobody is holding it. In many recent large fires, the fire did not win for lack of resources, but because those resources were busy defending houses and running evacuations.

Current orthophoto of Santa Cruz de la Serós: the village has spread with scattered building up the slope, and the old cultivated terraces are covered in shrub and trees reaching the houses.
Aerial photograph of Santa Cruz de la Serós in the 1956 American Flight survey: the village is compact and entirely surrounded by worked terraces and arable fields.
Santa Cruz de la Serós · 1956 Today
Santa Cruz de la Serós (Huesca). In 1956 the village was compact and ringed by cultivated terraces: that farmed belt was its defence. Today building has spread up the slope, the terraces have closed over with shrub and trees, and vegetation reaches the walls. American Flight survey (1956) and current PNOA imagery, CNIG Digital Photo Library and IGN.
Diagram of the defensible space around a house Three rings around a house: the first few metres with nothing flammable, an intermediate strip of thinned vegetation and, beyond it, the forest. Forest 0–5 m · nothing that burns no firewood, no hedges, no furniture, no leaves in the gutter 5–30 m · low-flammability strip thinned and pruned trees, no shrub under the canopy embers →
Most houses lost in a wildfire do not burn from the flame front, but from embers that land before the fire arrives and catch in a woodpile, a hedge against the wall, a timber deck or the leaf litter in the gutter. That is why the first five metres matter more than any other measure. Many Spanish regions also require a perimeter strip of 25 to 30 m of low-flammability vegetation around estates and isolated buildings bordering woodland; check the specific rules for each region. Conceptual diagram.

What can actually be changed

Of the four pieces, two —heat and drought— are given, and only shift over long timescales. The other two are decisions: the state of the land and where and how we build. And they are precisely what determines whether an extreme day ends in a megafire or in one more fire.

Give the landscape its breaks back

Thinning and pruning in the densest stands, targeted grazing to keep shrub in check, bringing back crops and pasture at strategic points, and prescribed burning where the forester judges it appropriate. This is not about "cleaning up" the whole countryside —that is unworkable— but about choosing where: the places fire always passes through.

Let the house defend itself

A maintained perimeter strip, the first five metres clear of anything that burns, vents and openings protected against embers, clean gutters, and access that lets a fire engine get in and out. A prepared house can survive with nobody defending it, and that frees up resources for the front.

Plan before building

Much of the risk is decided in land-use planning, not in firefighting. Regulating where building is allowed against woodland, requiring self-protection plans and guaranteeing evacuation routes is cheaper and more effective than any aircraft.

And even so: preventing ignition still comes first

With more than 90% of ignitions human in origin, respecting restricted periods, not using spark-generating machinery on high-risk days and not burning debris out of season remains the best value measure there is. Guide to what to do before, during and after (in Spanish) →

Where the data comes from

The diagrams on this page are conceptual: they illustrate a mechanism, they do not represent measurements. The only measured data is the chart of area burned per year.

Observatorio Forestal aggregates and labels public information, but it is not an emergency service and does not replace official channels. In the event of a fire, always call 112 and follow the instructions of the civil protection authorities.

Want to talk about your case?

Self-protection plans, perimeter strips, fuel management and post-fire assessment. We are forestry engineers based in Aragón. Reply within 24–48 h.

Tell us about it →